How We Research, Test and Review
This page explains what we do, what we refuse to do, and how to tell which of the two you are reading. If a guide on this site ever fails the standard below, it is a bug and we want to hear about it.
- Sources cited, not implied
- Bought at retail price
- Corrections published, not buried

Two tracks, two evidence standards
Almost everything on HomeNerdy is one of two things, and they are not held to the same bar. Knowing which one you are reading is the single most useful thing this page can give you.
| Guides and how-tos | Nerdy Reviews | |
|---|---|---|
| Built from | Manufacturer documentation, industry standards, professional consensus, documented user outcomes | Hands-on use of a product we bought ourselves |
| Claims hands-on testing | No, and says so | Yes, and says how long for |
| Typical language | “per manufacturer guidance”, “commonly recommended”, “widely reported” | “we ran this for six weeks and…” |
| Label | Category badge | Nerdy Reviews badge |
When one of our writers does have direct hands-on experience with a method inside a research-led guide, we say so in the guide, at the point it is relevant. We never imply it site-wide.
How a guide gets made
- Research, before a word is written
Product manuals, safety data sheets and official manufacturer recommendations first. Then the standards: EPA, OSHA and the relevant trade associations. Then what licensed professionals (plumbers, electricians, cleaning specialists) actually recommend. Last, the documented real-world outcomes, including the common mistakes.
- Diagnose before you prescribe
Every guide opens by helping you identify which problem you actually have. A limescale mark and an etched surface look similar and need opposite treatments; a guide that skips the diagnosis will damage something.
- Order methods gentlest first
You should never open with the nuclear option. Methods escalate, and each one names the materials it is safe on and the ones it is not.
- State the limits
Every method carries what it cannot do. If a popular hack has limited effectiveness, that goes in before you waste an afternoon on it.
- Editorial review against the checklist
Nothing publishes until it clears the checklist below.
The publishing checklist
Every guide clears all seven before it goes live. This is the same list our editor works from.
- Safety warnings present, prominent, and above the method they apply to
- No absolute claims: no “always works”, no “guaranteed”
- Sources cited for every technical and safety claim
- Limitations stated for each method, not just the article as a whole
- A “when to call a professional” section, with a real threshold
- Materials compatibility verified against manufacturer guidance
- The evidence basis is labelled: research-led, or hands-on
How a Nerdy Review gets made
We buy everything ourselves. Every product is purchased at retail price from an ordinary shop, online or in person. We do not accept free products, manufacturer samples, sponsored placements or copy approval. If we recommend something, it is because we would spend our own money on it again.
We use it in the conditions you would. Cleaning products go on real stains and real surfaces, not lab swatches. Tools are used on actual jobs rather than unboxed and described. Appliances do everyday cooking, not one demo run. Durability is judged over weeks, because first impressions are the least reliable part of a review.
| Criterion | What we are actually asking |
|---|---|
| Performance | Does it do the thing it claims, and how does it compare with the obvious alternative? |
| Value | Is it worth the price? Where a cheaper option performs nearly as well, we name it. |
| Durability | How is it after weeks of regular use, not after the first afternoon? |
| Ease of use | Can an ordinary person use it without frustration, and what is the learning curve? |
| Safety | What can go wrong, and what protection does the job need? |
This track is deliberately small. We would rather publish few reviews we stand behind than a catalogue we do not.
What we will not do
- Accept payment, free products or samples in exchange for coverage
- Let a brand see, approve or influence a guide before it publishes
- Claim hands-on testing we have not done
- Publish an absolute claim, however good it would look in a search result
- Recommend a method we would not use on our own home
- Quietly re-date an old guide to make it look current
Corrections
We will get things wrong. When we do, the correction goes on the guide itself, dated, saying what changed. We do not delete the error quietly and we do not bury the note at the bottom of an unrelated page.
If you have found something wrong, especially anything with a safety consequence, tell us and we will look at it. That is the fastest way to make this site better and we treat it as a favour, not a complaint.
Found something on this site that fails the standard above?Safety problems go to the top of the queue.
Report it to the editor